Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tiago L.'s avatar

Great post Kyle 👍

I think you’re right. Just be mindful that even “taste” itself will become harder to compete on. AI agents are getting better harnesses and workflows, and being systematic in the way they collect feedback and test their hypothesis.

A visionary will still occasionally outperform the system, but over time, strong and repeatable processes may become the main source of scalable “good taste”, especially as AGI capabilities appear.

That said, "taste" may end up being intimately human, like in "Her", and you nailed it well:

trust, branding, community, and network effects.

The other thing I’d add is this:

- Problems are infinite.

- Reality and physics still impose constraints.

- AGI doesn’t automatically cure cancer or invent near-light-speed engines.

- We still need experimentation, trade-offs, and human ownership.

And many of those trade-offs are not purely rational / probabilistic. They’re ethical, political, emotional, or motivational.

That’s why humans will remain central in areas where trust, persuasion, leadership, creativity, and social coordination matter. Politics, entrepreneurship, acting, sales, community-building, etc. will likely be heavily augmented, not replaced.

Some roles will disappear. Some will shrink (like customer chat support). Entirely new categories will emerge (like AI Engineer has), while everyone else just gets significantly augmented.

Because in the end, productivity doesn’t eliminate demand, it's insatiable. As we solve problems faster, humans create new ambitions, industries, and new problems worth solving (that weren't possible before).

We won't end up in a jobless economy, we will just end up with a much bigger economy.

Anyway, my 2 cents. Thanks once again Kyle and keep up with the good writing 💪

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?